Boots Longer Lashes Waterproof Mascara

No Image


4 reviews

0% would repurchase

Package Quality: 2.8

Price: $$$

Package Quality: 2.8

Price: $$$


Start your review

on 10/6/2007 7:37:00 PM

Age: 30-35

Skin: Sensitive, Medium, Neutral

Hair: Brunette, Wavy, Medium

Eyes: Black

The only thing I can add to the existing reviews is that it made my eyes sting. Definitely not worth buying!

on 8/1/2007 4:30:00 PM

Age: 30-35

Skin: Acne-prone, Fair, Not Sure

Hair: Black, Other, Other

Eyes: Brown

Wow, this was a terrible mascara that I bought on a whim at CVS. Should've checked here first!

Age: 25-29

Skin: Normal, Other, Not Sure

Hair: Blond, Other, Other

Eyes: Blue

Absolutely the worst mascara I have ever used and that's saying a heck of a lot! I don't know if the main issue is the brush, the formula or the excess mascara remover at the top inside of the tube but it's impossible to get any normal and decent amount of mascara on the brush. The formula itself is more liek a tinted gloss for lashes as it's not normal mascara formula. It takes a minimum of 15 strokes per section of lash to even come close to achieving half of what I can normally achieve w/ 3 or 4 swipes of any other mascara. This stuff is damn expensive for being so crappy too! Over $10 at Target no less. The most I have ever spent on mascara and the worst mascara I have ever used. Needless to say I will never ever buy another Boots brand mascara.

on 3/22/2007 12:08:00 PM

Age: 25-29

Skin: Oily, Other, Not Sure

Hair: Brown, Other, Other

Eyes: Brown

to my shame, i must confess i've read the previous review but chose to take my chances, as i needed a lenghtening waterproof mascara and had owned other great products from no.7.
not this one though. it's indeed incredibly bad, and quite expensive too. it doesn't show on the lashes almost at all, but somehow the brush manages to disperse the product on the eyelid.... and it also smuges, while naturally remaining very hard to take of.

Back to Top