WRITE A REVIEW
72% would repurchase
Package Quality: 4.0
Nars Radiant Creamy Concealer
NARS radiant creamy concealer Custard
nars radiant creamy concealer ginger (pending)
Filter by skin/hair/eye
Filter by age
Start your review
on 11/12/2017 8:31:00 PM
More reviews by Deedianne
Skin: Acne-prone, Tan, Not Sure
Hair: Black, Other, Other
My have oily/combination skin and found this concealer to be very drying. I tried using this under my eyes with with 2 different eye creams and alone and the result after a few hours were always the same - flaky, creasey mess. It looked like I had eye sand under my eyes and when I tried to blend it, the product would look worst.I also tried it as a contour and it left my nose looking flaky / skin pealing effect.I have now switched to It cosmetics bye bye under eye and love it!
on 10/18/2017 10:04:00 PM
More reviews by LaDolceVita8
Skin: Acne-prone, Fair-Medium, Warm
Hair: Black, Wavy, Other
This is great for under eyes, not that great for covering acne.Coverage: Medium. It doesn't really cover acne and redness that well partially because it blends out so much that its hard to build up coverage. Consistency: True to its name, very creamy and incredibly easy to blend. Looks very natural and doesn't cake up at all, which is why its ideal for under eye concealing. Overall: I really need to conceal acne and redness and don't really have bad dark circles so I probably would not repurchase because I'm looking for a concealer that has higher coverage than what Nars offers.
3 of 3 people found this helpful.
on 8/17/2017 5:51:00 AM
More reviews by toriaannesley
Age: 18 & Under
Skin: Acne-prone, Fair-Medium, Not Sure
Hair: Brunette, Other, Other
Pros:Very pigmented coverage Great for covering under eyesEasy applicatorGood colour range Cons:Very expensive Product runs out quite quickly Quite dry - sometimes emphasised lines and difficult to blend out. Overall while the coverage is great the price point is too high to keep on buying - wasn't worth it for me.
1 of 1 people found this helpful.
on 7/23/2017 11:48:00 PM
More reviews by shimmersweetie
Skin: Acne-prone, Fair-Medium, Neutral
Hair: Brown, Wavy, Coarse
Wow. Here I go hating on yet another product that gets rave reviews from almost everyone on the Internet! :( I really wanted to love this product...I really did. However, it made my undereye area look super crepey, regardless of my application technique. I didn't feel right throwing out such a pricey product, so I decided to try it on my jawline and cheeks to cover some old discolorations. Bad idea: it accentuated my pores and broke me out all 3 times I wore it on my face. :( Extremely disappointed.The only good thing to come out of this concealer: I ended up trying and LOVING Maybelline Fit Me concealer after hearing that it was a dupe for this one! The Maybelline Fit Me is so much more affordable, makes my undereye area look smooth, and I can use it to cover discolorations on the rest of my face without breaking out! What's more, Fit Me shade 120 matches my skintone far better than Nars Radiant Creamy Vanilla.
on 7/11/2017 11:35:00 AM
More reviews by Notlindsey
For my light/medium skin and yellow undertones- I purchase this concealer in Custurd. I like it because the coverage is excellent on my blemished areas AND it doesn't eventually dry out and flake off on my dry skin! My biggest complaint is torn between the packaging and how much you actually get for the money. If it was in a pod or even a squeezable tube you would get more from it and get to use your own concealer brush and would be able to clean your brush! I also like to apply this under my eyes after my primer and color combating concealers. I would suggest the Maybelline Age Rewind as a drugstore dupe for this product.
2 of 2 people found this helpful.
on 6/23/2017 11:42:00 AM
More reviews by Allmacedup10
Hair: Brown, Other, Other
I use this for the under eye area and to outline my brows so I use one shade lighter than what I would use on the rest of my face. It is soft and therefore easy to blend without pulling the delicate skin under the eyes. The coverage is honestly nothing special and I've gotten the same with Maybelline Fit Me concealer, which is obviously much cheaper. The colour match is, however, better and there is a greater range. It is quite expensive but I have had it for over 6 months and don't seem to be running out at all. It doesn't really crease throughout the day but I do find that by the end of the day, my underage area no longer looks as bright or as covered as it did right after application.
on 6/22/2017 11:47:00 AM
More reviews by champagnemamii
Skin: Acne-prone, Fair, Not Sure
One of the best concealer!I'm on my 6th bottle already now and this product has never disappoint me except for the fact that it is impossible to scoop out the leftover concealer out of the bottle when it almost run out It has a nice medium to heavy coverage which is perfect for my skin that has a lot of acne scars and redness
on 5/23/2017 1:55:00 PM
More reviews by oliviasanta
Hair: Brunette, Wavy, Fine
I have the deluxe sample size (13$) in the shade Vanilla and I'm very glad i didn't buy the full-size tube. I have very noticeable blue-purple undereye circles and my undereye area has fine lines that crease naturally (without having mature skin). This was simply too creamy for my undereyes to handle and it caked up and emphasized my fine lines and creased pretty badly when powdered.The main reason I don't like it is the price and the wide availability of better, cheaper alternatives. I can find good concealers at the drugstore that do better on me than this concealer and even my HG - pro-longwear from MAC - is less expensive. Even something with less coverage, when paired with a corrector, looks much better. As for a drugstore dupe for this, the milani one in the squeeze tube is a very similar creamy formula that I'd recommend trying out first.I'd recommend this only if you have naturally crease-free undereyes that are generally dry.
on 3/17/2017 4:11:00 PM
More reviews by Matteroyal
I will make a comparison with MAC pro longwear concealer. I don't feel this Nars concealer to give me any hydrating, so it is on the same level as MAC with hydrating thing. This concealer has a thicker texture than MAC and it can crease more easily on me, and I always set my undereyes with Laura Mericer Secret brightninger powder. I like to apply my concealer with a brush, but with Nars I have to use my finger to make it crease less on me. Overall I prefer MAC pro longwear conealer. It is cheaper than Nars, but Nars has better color selection than MAC.My foundation won't set nicely on my nose and throughout the day I don't have much foundation on my nose at all. I use MAC prolong wear on my nose and it does fade away slightly, but it is a good looking effect throughout the day on my nose and it sets nicely on my nose too. I use prolong wear as eyeshadow primer too and it works pretty good for that as well.Pro longwear concealer is hands down the best and thr price is just right too.
on 2/17/2017 4:56:00 AM
More reviews by whatev466
Skin: Acne-prone, Fair, Cool
Hair: Brown, Wavy, Fine
I think this concealer might be okay for spot concealing, and props for creating a shade light enough for super pale folks, but as an under-eye concealer, it was horrible. I don't have that many fine lines but it settled into all of them immediately. I regret buying it.
Are you sure this product is discontinued?
daasfdsad, asdadasd, addasdasdas, asdasdasdasfsdfgdfs, fgdssdgfdgfg, gfgdgdfgdhfgj
Reviewer did not try the product Profanity/Vulgar language Advertising (Vendor promotion, iHerb Coupons etc.) Marketing campaign (BzzAgent, Influenster etc.)