WRITE A REVIEW
44% would repurchase
Package Quality: 3.6
Sigma E40 - Tapered Blending Brush
Sigma E35 - Tapered Blending Brush
Filter by skin/hair/eye
Filter by age
Start your review
on 2/25/2017 7:11:00 PM
More reviews by Tygerlilee84
Skin: Acne-prone, Fair, Cool
Hair: Red, Straight, Other
This brush is supposedly a dupe for MAC 224 but I find it much larger. I feel it's too large for my eye. I can use it but it pretty much takes up my entire eyeball. I do use it for concealor or highlight. I can use the tip of it to buff in concealor if it's only a very light layer of concealor. My favorite way to use it is with highlighter. It's slightly small but works and my highlighter goes exactly where I want it. I prefer the MAC 133 for highlighter, but this is a good backup. This is not a super soft brush but it's not scratchy either. If I declutter my brushes this one might get passed on.
1 of 1 people found this helpful.
on 8/3/2016 7:52:00 PM
More reviews by onlouise
Skin: Combination, Fair, Not Sure
Hair: Brunette, Other, Other
I recently bought this after reading lots of positive reviews on it. It's very good for blending eyeshadow and leaving it looking absolutely flawless, however I found that it was slightly too big to use comfortably. It'd be better if it were slightly smaller.
on 2/5/2016 4:45:00 PM
More reviews by cathyyf
Skin: Very Dry, Olive, Not Sure
I was so excited to recieve my e40 but when I got it it looking NOTHING like the brushes the youtubers use!!! The bristles are longer and bend from side to side when trying to blend. Yuck
3 of 3 people found this helpful.
on 9/28/2015 11:21:00 PM
More reviews by TraceyDayle
I, like so many other reviewers here, am wildly disappointed with the Sigma e40. I am certain I have a genuine product having purchased it from an official retailer listed on the Sigma Beauty website. All the features on the brush all indicate a genuine product. However, like many others, my brush is different in both look and feel to the brush used by Jaclyn Hill. The bristles on my brush are long, the brush is not fluffy and when used in the windscreen wiper motion the bristles bend side to side rather than splay out slightly at the end for the perfect blend. What this means is the shadow smears across the lid rather than blend across the lid. Given I'm sure it's genuine and I have seen many comparison photos showing the two different bristle types, I can only conclude that there has been a change in the production or there are serious and significant concerns relating to the consistency of production. Maybe they're made in two different factories? Living in Australia purchasing Sigma products can be an expensive experience for substandard products. Either way, I am not satisfied, won't recommend and will likely never repurchase another Sigma product. I will stick to the much more affordable Zoeva 228 crease (amazing brush), the Morphe G17, Morphe M505 (tapered end but amazing), or Morphe M441. These brushes do a brilliant job and are a fraction of the price. Only issue with these products is shipping costs to Australia can get a bit steep, but overall am happy to pay for these brands as they still work out less expensive than MAC and Sigma and are better quality IMO.
on 7/18/2015 7:09:00 AM
More reviews by Colli
Skin: Combination, Other, Not Sure
Hair: Brown, Other, Other
This is my first review here, and I've been compelled to write it out of sheer disappointment. I've been looking for a decent blending brush for a while now, and although I would love to try the MAC 224, I just can't bring myself to spend £23 on it. When I lost my only half-decent blending brush, I was desperate and needed another one quickly. I had a free trial of Amazon Prime, so decided to buy a brush on there to make use of the free next day delivery. Enter the Sigma E40! I had heard it was a great dupe for the 224, and even though it was still quite pricey at £14, I decided to take the plunge. Most of the reviews were glowing, but there is one on Amazon to which I wish I had given more attention, particularly as it address the exact concerns that I have.I was actually really looking forward to getting the E40, so when the package arranged, I tore it open like a crazy person. My first inspection of the E40 generated a feeling of being slightly underwhelmed. It was fluffy and seemed reasonably soft, but I had expected it to be a bit more dense. The length of the bristles seemed very long too. Still, I put my initial concerns to one side and gave it a try.And this is where the searing disappointment comes in. The brush does not blend very well at all. It isn't dense enough to do a decent job, and this fact, when taken with the excessive length of the bristles, makes the blending process really awkward. The bristles bend from side-to-side, which means that I can't get a nice fluid blending motion going, and the resulting finished blend just looks... untidy. I have tried several times with this brush to get it right, and I just can't seem to handle it.After seeing some of the reviews on here, and on rereading a couple of more negative reviews on Amazon (in one of which the reviewer said, had she not bought it from a recognised Sigma reseller, she would have thought she had gotten a fake!), there are many people that agree with me. I wish I had seen the reviews on here first, because I probably would have gone for a different brush. Having looked at some blog pictures of the E40, I've come to a few conclusions. Some pictures seem to show a different looking brush-head to that on the one I received; in several images the E40 brush actually looks like the MAC 224, with good shape, decent density and bristles that aren't excessively long. In a few others, it looks a bit more like mine - less dense with longer bristles. This must mean that either Sigma have changed the design of this brush, or that there is a great deal of inconsistency in the manufacturing process. I have also entertained the idea that some fakes are creeping onto the market, although this seems unlikely - the ferrule and handle of my brush have the Sigma detailing which seems too well done to make it a fake, plus it is still much more profitable to counterfeit the ever-popular MAC brushes.To summarise: my experience with the E40 means that I can't recommend this brush to anyone. I took delivery of a Morphe E23 brush this morning, and although I haven't used it yet, it looks and feels far superior to the E40. Do yourself a favour - don't buy into the Sigma hype and shop around for your brushes!
6 of 6 people found this helpful.
on 4/12/2015 10:02:00 AM
More reviews by mayelyhood
Age: 18 & Under
Skin: Combination, Medium, Not Sure
I love this brush. Although when I first got it I didn't love it at first. It was not fluffy and it was almost scratchy to the eyes while blending. But once I broke it in and used it a couple times the brush became very fluffy and it blended out product beautifully. You just have to brake it in people.
on 4/6/2015 8:18:00 PM
More reviews by ckarachr
Skin: Normal, Fair-Medium, Not Sure
Hair: Blond, Other, Other
I love this brush! Great for the crease!
on 4/5/2015 4:22:00 PM
More reviews by CheckyDoll
Skin: Combination, Fair, Neutral
Hair: Red, Other, Other
I LOVE this brush! Most Sigma brushes in general, in fact. I find this brush to be WAY better than the MAC 224 and I am a former MAC employee. I have/had many 224's along the years and now pretty much have switched to this. It's fluffier & much softer. I took off one lippie due to sometimes inconsistent quality of Sigma brushes. Most of what I own are fantastic but I have about 6 or seven of these brushes and they differ as far as size, fluffiness, etc.Same with my E25's. Long story short though, I adore Sigma brushes and this one is my FAVE!
on 3/31/2015 8:31:00 AM
More reviews by cleogirl
Skin: Combination, Fair, Warm
Hair: Brunette, Curly, Medium
I will give Sigma credit where credit is due: they are excellent at marketing their products. Unfortunately for the consumer, we pay for that pricey marketing strategy. I cannot speak to any other brush within their lines as the E40 is the only one I've ever purchased (and I can safely say, will be the last) but to describe it in one word, it is mediocre. The beauty for Sigma is that customers never get to actually hold their products in their hands before purchasing. You are purchasing based on the many, many youtubers signing their constant praise and the many glowing online reviews. Again, brilliant marketing. Don't you want perfectly blended eyeshadow just like Jaclyn? (I am convinced that the design and quality of this brush has changed as this CANNOT be the same one that she uses and raves about.) Had I been able to look at this brush in person before buying it, i never in a million years would have purchased it. It is very cheaply made, very flimsy and scratchy and does not blend well at all. To add insult to injury, I actually paid $20 CDN for this brush. Essentially the same price as I paid for several Hakuhodo brushes and Sephora pro brush and triple what I paid for a far, FAR superior Morphe. Please people, do not buy into the hype and be the fool that I am. Spend your money wisely by investing in one of the many many superior blending brushes our there!
on 3/1/2015 9:11:00 PM
More reviews by hdcue23
Skin: Sensitive, Fair, Cool
Hair: Brunette, Wavy, Fine
Just like some of the other reviewers below, I'm not impressed. I purchased one of the Sigma brush collections a little over a year ago and this was included in the set. For one, it's terrible at blending out transition colors in the crease and looks splotchy and uneven, I've literally tried everything in getting my crease color to look good and I believe it's the brush that's the issue. I think it would have been better if it was smaller and a little more dense. I'm very happy with my other Sigma brushes but this one fell somewhat short.
Popular Makeup Brushes
Are you sure this product is discontinued?
daasfdsad, asdadasd, addasdasdas, asdasdasdasfsdfgdfs, fgdssdgfdgfg, gfgdgdfgdhfgj
Reviewer did not try the product Profanity/Vulgar language Advertising (Vendor promotion, iHerb Coupons etc.) Marketing campaign (BzzAgent, Influenster etc.)