REVLON Luxurious Lengths

Filtered by skin tone : Fair-Medium
REVLON Luxurious Lengths

2.9

26 reviews

34% would repurchase

Package Quality: 3.0

Price: $$

Package Quality: 3.0

Price: $$

INGREDIENTS

Where to Buy



Start your review


Age: 25-29

Skin: Combination, Fair-Medium, Neutral

Hair: Brunette, Wavy, Other

Eyes: Brown

This is the WORST mascara I've EVER used! It does absolutely NOTHING and the wand is a pain to use -- short bristles on one side, long on the other. The formula is such that it doesn't clump -- but then again rubbing water through your lashes also doesn't clump! This mascara has the effect of rubbing black water on your lashes. SAVE YOUR MONEY: don't buy this mascara. SAVE YOUR TIME: don't spend 20 minutes willing lashes to appear as you struggle with the disappointing wand and formula. DO NOT BUY THIS MASCARA!!!



Age: 25-29

Skin: Oily, Fair-Medium, Not Sure

Hair: Brunette, Other, Other

Eyes: Green

This is my everyday mascara, in blackened brown. It is a complete pain in the ass to use, but I like the effect. I have naturally long, dark lashes. It does make them much longer, somewhat thicker and just more defined, but not unnaturally so. It's not a dramatic mascara.


Every time I read reviews about other mascaras like Voluminous or Diorshow or even Lash Exact I'm always like, "what is this, some enchanted mascara? You don't have to wipe off the brush, apply once, sweep across lashes horizontally, apply from the tip to every single lash, apply again from the top of the lashes, wipe down the lashes from clumps, wipe all the smudges off your eye lids, then wipe everything off your hands? What magical land does der Zaubermascara come from?"


Maybe with another brush it would be better. Or every package I've bought was past due. I consider it my "special needs" makeup tool. There are so many better mascaras out there, it's kind of like in 5th grade when I told my friends I liked the Monkees better than the Beatles. Obviously I'm embarrassingly wrong. But I just really like the lengthening effect without looking like the sleepy-eyed fringe on a drink-and-wet doll baby.

3 of 4 people found this helpful.


on 4/3/2007 4:00:00 PM

Age: 44-55

Skin: Oily, Fair-Medium, Not Sure

Hair: Brunette, Other, Other

Eyes: Brown

THIS WAS LOVE AT FIRST SIGHT!!! I'm floored by the bad reviews on this. I've used all the old and new mascara favorites, and I prefer this to any of them. This is the first time I've actually enjoyed applying mascara, because it's fool-proof and the results are so rewarding. As mentioned by others, you must stroke the brush through several times, but the payoff is upswept, totally separated, and long lashes. Blot the tip to remove excess, but don't blot any excess mascara off the wand. You can keep brushing it through without it going dry. Then IF you want more volume, you can use the short side. I usually only use the long bristles. This is a truly no-clump mascara that goes on in thin coats and actually feels silky. You get a natural tapered lash instead of a uniform thickness from root to tip. No flakes or smears and my eyes never itch. I will use this for as long as they make it. LOVE IT.

1 of 1 people found this helpful.


on 1/26/2007 4:24:00 AM

Age: 19-24

Skin: Normal, Fair-Medium, Not Sure

Hair: Black, Other, Other

Eyes: Black

Iíve reviewed this before but wanted to add: each coat applies very thinly and I need to apply more than with other mascara. The pay off with so much more work is that it doesnít clump and u can keep stroking coat after coat while still getting separated lashes (natural) without the stuck-together look. Doesnít flake or smudge. If I want a more dramatic look, Iíd use another mascara after 1st using this as a base coat, because this applies thinly without clumps, it gives the other mascara something to build on (whereas without this as a base coat, a thicker mascara may clump when used on my thin lashes).


on 1/6/2007 1:39:00 PM

Age: 25-29

Skin: Combination, Fair-Medium, Not Sure

Hair: Brown, Other, Other

Eyes: Green

I really, really like this mascara. This and L'Oreals Voluminous are my favorites out of all that I have tried both end and drugstore. With Luxurious Lengths I find that I do not even have to curl my lashes. My lashes bare I would say are short to medium length... and with 2 coats of this I get long, full, curled upwards lashes. In my pics I have on here with me in the short sleeve black sweater I am wearing this... and it really does make my lashes look long and full. My co worker always askes me what I use on my lashes and she went out and bought some and now she uses it all the time. I mostly used the side with the longer bristles and if I want extra dramatic I do a 3rd coat and use the short side to build of more color and fullness. I have actually been using this daily since it first came out... I have probably gone through 6+ tubes of it so far. I have not had any problems with smudging, and the only time I have a problem with flaking is when the tube dries out... but that happens with any mascara that is drying up... it will flake. I will certainly buy again.


on 11/27/2006 11:18:00 AM

Age: 25-29

Skin: Combination, Fair-Medium, Neutral

Hair: Brown, Straight, Fine

Eyes: Blue

Sigh. It promised me so much. This is an okay mascara. It did what it said it would do, lengthen and curl, however, you REALLY have to WORK AT IT in order to get it on! Either my tube was dry, or its just a dry formula, but it took about 4 coats on each eye in order to see some results. Will not be buying again. In fact I think I"ll just throw it out now.


on 11/25/2006 8:52:00 AM

Age: 19-24

Skin: Combination, Fair-Medium, Not Sure

Hair: Black, Other, Other

Eyes: Brown

Didn't do much for my lashes. Added a little bit of length, did not volumise whatsoever. Smudged VERY quickly. I also tried the waterproof version, same result. Complete waste of money.


on 10/10/2006 3:32:00 PM

Age: 30-35

Skin: Dry, Fair-Medium, Warm

Hair: Brown, Curly, Fine

Eyes: Green

One of the worst mascaras I've ever used. It's really ironic that they actually named this product "Luxurious Lengths," because it doesn't lengthen AT ALL. The brush, as other reviewers have noted, is weird and ineffectual. Run, do not walk, to another option.


on 7/11/2006 1:06:00 AM

Age: 25-29

Skin: Normal, Fair-Medium, Neutral

Hair: Black, Straight, Medium

Eyes: Black

I don't know why I even bought this. Was it Eva Mendes's gorgeous lashes (which were most likely fake and digitally reimaged) in the ads or was it because I'm just a sucker for any mascara promising length? To think that I wasted my Ulta Revlon BOGOF on this when I could've bought another foundation or a lipstick. I'm kicking myself. Although it doesn't clump, Luxurious Lengths delivers very little lenghtening and no volume or curl. Not even lift. The formula is a bit on the dry side. It also smudges horribly within an hour or two. The brush is a gimmick. How does the flat side build color and the curved side lenghten? I didn't notice any difference in either side. Overall not a good mascara and I predict it'll be gone within a year, only to be replaced by another lousy Revlon mascara.


on 6/27/2006 10:43:00 AM

Age: 19-24

Skin: Oily, Fair-Medium, Warm

Hair: Black, Other, Medium

Eyes: Brown

Ditto Bubbles68 - I swear this makes my lashes look SHORTER. I'm just glad I got this on sale.


Back to Top