L'Oreal True Match Super-Blendable Makeup SPF 17

3.3

3070 reviews

56% would repurchase

Package Quality: 3.0

Price: $$

Package Quality: 3.0

Price: $$

INGREDIENTS

Active: Titanium Dioxide (3.01%) Inactive: Water, Isododecane, Cyclopentasiloxane, Glycerin, Cyclohexasiloxane, PEG-10 Dimethicone, Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer, Butylene Glycol, Dimethicone, Isoeicosane, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone, Sodium Chloride, Polyglyceryl-4 Isostearate, Hexyl Laurate, C9-15 Fluoroalcohol Phosphate, Isostearyl Neopentanoate, Diazolidnyl Urea, Methylparaben, Propylparaben, Tocopherol, Panthenol, Alumina, Methicone. May Contain: Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides, Mica, Yellow 5 Lake, Red 7, FIL B34903/3. (Taken from packaging, 12/2010, USA)


on

Age: 25-29

Skin: Dry, Tan, Warm

Hair: Black, Straight, Other

Eyes: Brown

Yes yes yes!! I've been using the product for YEARS and it still is one of my favorite foundations. The formula is amazing and feels great on my skin. I've gotten compliments on this foundation more than my high end products. Highly recommend this product if you're looking for an cheaper alternative to expensive liquid foundation.

3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.



Age: 18 & Under

Skin: Acne-prone, Fair, Not Sure

Hair: Blond, Other, Other

Eyes: Green

I have drier skin, and while I applaud Loreal for their variety of colors, this staff cracks on my face. I heard so much praise for this foundation, I'm disappointed.


on

Age: 19-24

Skin: Acne-prone, Fair-Medium, Not Sure

Hair: Brown, Other, Other

Eyes: Black

This foundation is ok,I just hate how there is no pump and how the product can get so messy.I like the concept that it has a undertone matching system which knocks out Many options.For me I love how the foundation is natural looking and it's medium to full coverage.I have gotten lighter but sadly W3 and W4 are too dark for me.W2 is ok but still too light.I wish they had a W2.5 or something in between .This is great foundation for teenagers since it isn't so cakey and natural.Ive been wearing this since high school and it does wonders.But now that I'm older I moved on to other foundations but this comes handy a few times if you don't want to use your holy grail foundation.


on

Age: 19-24

Skin: Combination, Fair-Medium, Warm

Hair: Brunette, Straight, Medium

Eyes: Brown

**UPDATED REVIEW**
I am happy with this foundation, very natural and isn't thick or cakey. It suits my skin and compliments my skin. Stays on and doesn't slide off etc. Very happy with this product



I recently purchased this and tried it for the first time. I was looking for a new foundation to try as currently my foundations/bb creams are way too dark for me right now. Im originally from Australia and have been living in The Netherlands for the past year and my skin tone is very pale at the moment so they don't match me and it's currently winter here, I have oily skin and have to be careful with certain products and moisturisers but at the moment my skin is the opposite I am not used to Dutch Winters.

I purchased this foundation on sale and matched it to my skin tone. I also purchased the powder to go with it. I only went out to certain family friend's houses for coffee and cake (very popular here in Holland) and I was happy with the way my make up looked on my skin and didn't crack or slide off. I do want to see how it holds up If i'm out and about, that is the main test.

I wouldn't normally buy L'oreal as it is expensive in Australia. Even though it's known as a "drugstore product" the prices are ridiculous. Seeing as it was on sale here in Holland and worked out I would be saving money I thought "Why not".


on

Age: 19-24

Skin: Dry, Fair-Medium, Not Sure

Hair: Black, Other, Other

Eyes: Brown

I used this throughout highschool and it was my holy grail foundation. So I recently decided to revisit this holy grail foundation of mine and nothing has changed.

Medium buildable coverage with a satin finish (I say it's satin but I have very dry skin so it might be different for others). Never had any issues with it caking up on my skin. Blushes and bronzers blend easily on top.

Best applied with a damp makeup sponge like a Beauty Blender or drugstore alternatives of it.

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.


on

Age: 25-29

Skin: Oily, Fair, Not Sure

Hair: Brunette, Other, Other

Eyes: Hazel

I've had this for a year. January 15'-January 16' I have acne-prone, oily skin, and I live in Texas. This is my deep winter foundation. I forget about it spring/summer/fall. It's great for dry skin, and doesn't melt in cold temperatures. I bought this after Maybelline fitme gave me a terrible break out, and I wanted a foundation that would not give me acne! This foundation doesn't break me out, but it does not last long. Breaks throughout the day are needed to make sure this foundation hasn't moved around too much.

This foundation is blendable, you can't feel it on your face. I'm not sure what the finish is..not quite matte, but not all the way dewy. My face looks brighter with this on, but I can't detect any microshimmer (thank goodness). Setting this with powder is a must or it will not last.


on

Age: 25-29

Skin: Normal, Fair, Not Sure

Hair: Red, Other, Other

Eyes: Brown

For me this is over rated as hell. Sure, it has a nice colour selection...but no other redeeming features for me. Thin, transfers and just doesn't last. Barely any coverage but still can look cakes? Maybe I used the wrong type of primer/application or something. Will give it another go and edit in anything extra.


on

Age: 19-24

Skin: Combination, Olive, Not Sure

Hair: Black, Other, Other

Eyes: Brown

I seriously hate this product. They no longer carry my shade W3.5, so now I have to mix W4 and N1. it almost always oxidizes, transfers, and despite the fact that I have an oily t-zone only, I almost always look oily. Not dewy, oily! I do not recommend and I will not repurchase.


on

Age: 19-24

Skin: Oily, Fair-Medium, Neutral

Hair: Black, Wavy, Coarse

Eyes: Brown

The one thing that this line is known for is the color selection. I agree with the hype about this. I am a yellow, warm undertone and there are so many shades for me whether I'm paler or more tanned. I typically use W3 as a base. If I need to go darker, I can just mix my W5 and it's perfect. I love the coverage and blendability of this foundation so much. I also love how cheap this foundation is! The only negative thing I can think of is how liquidy it is and that there is no pump. I often find myself pouring out so much product and then just wiping it away with a napkin. It's such a waste. But, because of its affordability, I don't mind too much.


Age: 19-24

Skin: Oily, Fair-Medium, Not Sure

Hair: Brown, Other, Other

Eyes: Blue

I actually did not buy it, I got this from my mom, who works as a journalist, and gets tons of new make-up products every other month. Sadly, since these are sent by companies, she can not always pick the right shade (they would send 3-4 bottles of each product, not an entire line). So, I got this in August, I believe, opened it once and I did not like it. It did not match my skin-tone (I have a fair skin, but I was tanned then as well), and generally I found it to be way too cakey, and watery. I like a bit more cream-like foundations, or even mousses, as I prefer full coverage (my skin tends to get red, and I have some acne scars). I gave it a go again this winter, once my skin was in its natural shade. It matched me per-fec-tly. The colour match was on point, but then again I was afraid my face would get cakey and all that jazz. I moisturized, primed and then put the foundation on with a beauty blender (I have got an oily skin, I always need to prime). It looked great, even in the strong light. My peach fuzz was invisible, although I felt a tiny bit masky (is this a word). I mean it looked so good, I almost looked as painted. I later used powder, and a setting spray, for it not to smudge. With oily skin everything always smudges. But True Match did not, it could be the setting spray, but I really looked good all day. I do not know how to describe it, but as I was first applying it I thought 'nah girl, it ain't even mid-coverage', when I was finishing the make-up though, it started to look as it is actually full coverage. I do not know, maybe it needs to set, maybe I put on a little too much. Either way, I liked the final affect, and I would go as far as to say that it is a bit better than Estee Lauder's Double-Wear. The only problem I have, it has a bit too watery formula, but I can definitely work with that.


Back to Top