March 30, 2015 | 1832 users online

NARS Pure Radiant Tinted Moisturizer

Average Rating 4.0/5
70% would buy again
384 reviews

Where to buy

Review by DarlaB

rated 4 of 5 on 5/17/2012 3:59:00 PM More reviews by DarlaB

Age: 25-29 Skin: Very Dry, Fair, Cool Hair: Brunette, Curly, Fine Eyes: Blue

So, I've been using this TM for about a month now and I really like it. I've previously used Laura Mercier TM (pretty good, a lot less coverage than Nars), and Aveeno (horrible, sparkly and greasy) Pros --> Good coverage - It's a lot higher than the other TM I've used and it's almost on par with the Sheer Glow foundation, which I love --> Moisturizing - I still use a moisturizer before, but I also recognize that I have very dry skin and need a richer moisturizer than most skin types --> Finish - It gives me a nice 'glow' without looking greasy --> Packaging - Squeeze tube which is simple, sturdy, and hygienic Cons --> Price - It's more than what I would like to pay for (but what isn't?) but Nars is a higher end brand, so I know I will pay more --> Shade range - This is the big drawback for me, and why I took off a lippy. I'm using Finland, which I can get away with, but they don't have anything really suitable for the very pale or cool, pink toned people. I use Mont Blanc in Nars Sheer Glow, and I really wish they had something closer to that Overall, I am very pleased with this purchase. I've been applying this with my fingers, add some concealer where I need it (generally around the nose and under the eyes) and sometimes set it with MUFHD powder. If you don't need a ton of coverage and and can find a shade that matches I would highly recommend testing it out.

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Did you? Yes No

Read 384 reviews of Pure Radiant Tinted Moisturizer