July 31, 2014 | 1726 users online

Fragrance - Prada - Ambre Pour Homme



image 0

rated 4.6(13 reviews)

  • Average Rating: 4.6
  • 100% would buy again
  • Package Quality: 4.7
  • Price: $$$$

  • Ingredients
  • Write a Review
Pin It

rated 5 of 5 on 10/3/2006 2:18:00 AM More reviews by product_ho

Age: 36-43 Skin: Dry, Other, Not Sure Hair: Brown, Other, Other Eyes: Brown

Very, very nice. An uncluttered, soapy labdanum start with a unisex/feminine feel to it but dries down over time to a more manly amber smell. A joy to smell and a joy to wear on either sex. Classic.

Is this review helpful? Yes No

rated 5 of 5 on 9/25/2006 11:56:00 PM More reviews by demoninthedark

Age: 19-24 Skin: Combination, Other, Not Sure Hair: Brunette, Other, Other Eyes: Brown

FANTASTIC fragrance!! Definitely a very unisex and universally flattering, timeless scent. Very empowering for a woman to wear {since it is a men's fragrance}. I agree with the reviewer below that it isn't too sharp or aquatic like most men's fragrances. Prada definitely conjured up a winner with this one. Definitely a better mix than their women's EDP. Mysterious enough for nighttime wear, yet still very clean for day. Highly, highly recommend!!

Is this review helpful? Yes No

rated 4 of 5 top reviewer on 8/16/2006 4:11:00 PM More reviews by ECMac25

Age: 25-29 Skin: Normal, Medium, Warm Hair: Black, Straight, Medium Eyes: Black

This is a must-try (or must-buy!) for anyone who loves "fresh from the shower" types of fragrance. The amber in the name is misleading - this doesn't have the warmth and the spiciness of typical amber-based scents. It's simply brisk and very clean smelling. I find it to be suitable for everyone-it's definitely a unisex scent --- for a men's fragrance, it avoids being sharp or aquatic. Pretty good lasting power, and it layers well with my vanilla/sweet scents too. I wish Prada made their women's fragrances as appealing...in contrast, those are much too heavy for my nose.



2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you? Yes No